When explaining humor, it may be that melancholic and sanguine are actually a single factor that contain the multiple factors of phlegmatic and choleric.
When explaining learner, it may be that knower and discovery are actually a single factor that contain the multiple factors of known and recovery.
When arguing humor, the word melancholic asks why the word sanguine is a mystery but the word phlegmatic will state how the word choleric is logic.
When arguing learner, the word knower asks why the word discovery is a mystery but the word known will state how the word recovery is logic.
When explaining humor, it may be that melancholic and sanguine are actually a single factor that contain the multiple factors of phlegmatic and choleric.
When explaining learner, it may be that knower and discovery are actually a single factor that contain the multiple factors of known and recovery.
When arguing humor, the word melancholic asks why the word sanguine is a mystery but the word phlegmatic will state how the word choleric is logic.
When arguing learner, the word knower asks why the word discovery is a mystery but the word known will state how the word recovery is logic.
When explaining q1n, it may be that q1s and q1e are actually a single factor that contain the multiple factors of q1o and q1r.
When explaining q1n, it may be that q1s and q1e are actually a single factor that contain the multiple factors of q1o and q1r.
When arguing q1n, the word q1s asks why the word q1e is a mystery but the word q1o will state how the word q1r is logic.
When arguing q1n, the word q1s asks why the word q1e is a mystery but the word q1o will state how the word q1r is logic.